Proceeding contribution from Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 March 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Audit of Public Bodies) Order 2008.
Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Audit of Public Bodies) Order 2008
My Lords, I have very little to add to the discussion. If there is a sensible, more coherent way of doing this that avoids two forms of auditing, why are we not using it, as the noble Baroness asked?. I wonder whether the Royal Ulster Constabulary George Cross Foundation is the smallest body in the order. Other than that comment, we have no fundamental objection.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 700 c434-5
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Audit Accountancy Independent Living Fund NHS Non-departmental public bodies Pension Protection Fund Pensions Ombudsman National Audit Office NHS Direct Pension Protection Fund Ombudsman Royal Ulster Constabulary George Cross Foundation
- Legislation
- Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Audit of Public Bodies) Order 2008
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:54:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_457353
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_457353
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_457353