Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 3 April 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].


Employment Bill [HL]

I am certainly not a government adviser on what we are discussing today. I am a government adviser only on some aspects of constitutional reform, of which this does not form part. I went to see the Minister with the noble Lord, Lord Morris, as two Back-Benchers from our respective parties seeking to achieve a friendly and sensible compromise in everyone’s interest. It does not seem sensible to have a great battle, leading perhaps even to ping-pong between the two Houses, on issues that ought to be capable of being resolved in a sensible way. I have not told the Committee, nor should I or would I, what the Minister told us because that is not appropriate. All I can do is to suggest safeguards that Ministers may consider before Report. This is a rather boringly long way of saying that I believe that Clause 17 must stand part because it is essential and that we will have to find safeguards, which will need to be built in either on Report or at Third Reading.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c175-6GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Conditions of employment Contracts Employment Membership Political parties Trade unions Voluntary work
Legislation
Employment Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk