Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Philip Davies (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 25 April 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Food Products (Marketing to Children) Bill.


Food Products (Marketing to Children) Bill

My hon. Friend is right to raise that, and I return to clause 2(3), which is over-zealous to say the least. It proposes a restriction in respect of"““any brand name which is associated with””" unhealthy food products. By definition, any supermarket that retails the products whose advertising would be banned is a brand name ““associated with”” unhealthy products. On that basis, he is right to say that supermarkets might be prevented from advertising on TV. That would have a further massive impact on the income of broadcasters. I do think that the consequences of the Bill's extent, which is far beyond what most people would believe in, are fully understood. Supermarkets would also be prevented from promoting some things that benefit schools and some activities that take place in schools.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
474 c1650 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Advertising Broadcasting programmes Diabetes Food Labelling Heart diseases Nutrition Marketing Mental health Obesity Sports Television
Legislation
Food Products (Marketing to Children) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk