Proceeding contribution from Tom Clarke (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 May 2008. It occurred during Opposition day on Burma.
Burma
I regret that the House appears to have been invited to choose between a motion and an amendment. We can make up our minds later on how that came about, but may I suggest to my right hon. Friend, who has put a specific question, that the non-governmental organisations surely have a say in the matter? The Opposition motion ends with the words ““using direct aid drops””. As my right hon. Friend may be aware, Jane Cocking of Oxfam has said:"““The biggest risk is that aid air drops will be a distraction from what is really needed””." She has also referred to the huge importance of diplomatic efforts. Does that not demonstrate that my right hon. Friend is being entirely responsible?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 475 c1416
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disaster relief Disasters International assistance Humanitarian aid Myanmar Storms
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:20:47 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473001
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473001
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_473001