Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Austin Mitchell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on Public Accounts.


Public Accounts

Is it? We suggested that it needed a driving central authority, and our recommendation was accepted. I certainly feared that it was proceeding too slowly, but I think we achieved something. When we examined the academies programme, despite all the new techniques, solutions and approaches that were supposed to be on offer—after all, the academies had been given 20 million quid of Government money to go away and play with—we found that although there had been an improvement it was no greater than the Hawthorne effect, in which change means improvement, which then fades away. The Chairman may not know of one brilliant achievement of mine while the Committee was examining the use of Government buildings and space in London, as opposed to the rest of the country. As I passed the Treasury each day and looked down into the basement, I saw endless equipment, particularly coffee-making equipment, but no sign of human life. I took that as an indication that the Treasury was wasting space. However, I did achieve something. The following week when I walked past the Treasury the blinds were down, so I could not see what was going on in the basement. I am sorry to have to produce that as my one success of the whole programme. It has been a challenging year, and the programme has been very successful. I think that a little self-congratulation is very much in order for the entire Committee, its backing by the National Audit Office, its staff and its members.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
475 c1608 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Select committees Committee of Public Accounts
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk