Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Burrowes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 May 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords].


Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords]

Would the hon. Gentleman's concerns about discrimination not be satisfied by clause 53, ““Interpretation of references to father etc.””, which refers to the father and the woman who is the other parent? In cases in which a woman is"““in civil partnership at time of treatment””" or treatment is"““provided to woman who agrees that second woman to be present””," references to the father of the child who is a parent"““by virtue of that section””" could also be read as a reference to the woman, who would be classified as the ““other parent””. In terms of the legal definition, there would not be the discrimination that concerns the hon. Gentleman. That is the point that the Joint Committee made in its recommendations.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
476 c201-2 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children's rights Abortion Cohabitation Absent parents Counselling Women Fertility Homosexuality Human rights Human embryo experiments Eligibility IVF Discrimination Fathers Parents Married people Single people Women's rights
Legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk