Proceeding contribution from Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 May 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Mutilations (Permitted Procedures) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008.
Mutilations (Permitted Procedures) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008
I asked the noble Lord earlier about the consultation procedure and the degree to which it had dropped the catch. I am not seeking to apportion blame, but the somehow something quite significant in ensuring that the regulations worked—we are now addressing the deficiency—went wrong. Has the department looked at that and should the department have a more proactive role in ensuring that it stimulates the necessary response?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 701 c493GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Artificial insemination Animal welfare Birds Animal breeding Animal experiments Disease control Goats Poultry Livestock Nature conservation Sheep Tagging
- Legislation
- Mutilations (Permitted Procedures) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-04-08 09:37:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_475105
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_475105
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_475105