Proceeding contribution from Lord Waddington (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
My Lords, I have listened most carefully to the debate and I simply cannot understand the objections that have been raised to the amendment. Why should not this Parliament have the opportunity to discuss what the high representative is up to, on the basis of a report from the Secretary of State? What harm could possibly be done by placing an obligation on the Secretary of State to make such a report? I simply do not understand any of the speeches that have been made objecting to the amendment, which seems to me very moderate. It certainly does not cut across the scheme of the Bill as a whole.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c167
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Asylum Common fisheries policy Diplomatic service Borders Immigration European Union European communities Food Foreign policy Prices Treaties Security UK membership of EU Common agricultural policy Quotas Treaty of Lisbon Frontex
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:24:51 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477095
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477095
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477095