Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Monson (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Amendment) Bill.


European Union (Amendment) Bill

My Lords, perhaps I may ask the noble Baroness a question before she sits down. She explained very well and thoroughly her objections to Amendment No. 3 and I accept what she says; I do not necessarily agree with her but she explained logically her reasons for opposing Amendment No. 3. However, I do not think that she explained why she objects to Amendments Nos. 4 and 5. Amendment No. 4 would simply provide for extra safeguards against a move that might constitute a threat to the security of the United Kingdom and its citizens, while Amendment No. 5 would simply require the Secretary of State to explain why the Government have capitulated over a policy to which they formally objected quite strongly.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c203 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Asylum Common fisheries policy Diplomatic service Borders Immigration European Union European communities Food Foreign policy Prices Treaties Security UK membership of EU Common agricultural policy Quotas Treaty of Lisbon Frontex
Legislation
European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk