Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
My Lords, as Leader of the House, I am very clear that we should use Third Reading for the purposes detailed in the Companion. I have nothing further to say to the noble Lord on this. If he disagrees with me, he will decide whether to seek the opinion of the House. However, I thought long and hard about all the other possible scenarios and came up with none that I felt was of any merit. The noble Lord gave an extreme example that I do not believe exists in real life. The language of the treaty is clear. The noble Lord must decide. We have debated this twice and if he wishes to test the opinion of the House, that is for him. However, I do not believe that it is an appropriate matter to bring back at Third Reading.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c213
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Asylum Common fisheries policy Diplomatic service Borders Immigration European Union European communities Food Foreign policy Prices Treaties Security UK membership of EU Common agricultural policy Quotas Treaty of Lisbon Frontex
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:25:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477171
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477171
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477171