Proceeding contribution from Tony Lloyd (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Manchester City Council Bill [Lords](By Order).
Manchester City Council Bill [Lords](By Order)
If anyone could do the calculation faster than I, it would be my hon. Friend. An awful lot of pedlars licences would have to be sold to get back the £100,000 that it costs to promote such a Bill. It would make a lot of sense not to go through the private Bill procedure and to have national legislation instead, but at the moment we have a patchwork: some authorities have got their private Bills through the House already, and, as has been noted, many more are in the pipeline. The private Bill procedure is not a sensible way to introduce common standards of this type. A different approach would be better.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 477 c525
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Canterbury City Council Nottingham City Council Manchester City Council Reading Borough Council Regulation Street trading Bournemouth Borough Council Leeds City Council
- Legislation
- Manchester City Council Bill (HL) 2006-07 to 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:17:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_481403
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_481403
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_481403