Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

Before the noble Lord formally withdraws the amendment, perhaps I may pick up on a couple of points he has raised with me. He has described the policy as a see-saw. It has been very important to construct consensus and balance around this. I would describe it as being an equilibrium, and that is where we are. In our deliberations we need to be mindful of the consensus, which has been hard fought for and hard won, and I am sure it will be uppermost in our minds. The noble Lord asked me where in legislation are the provisions to deal with regulations on pension schemes. I understand they are in the disclosure of information regulations of 1996. Specifically on agency workers, I was referring to Clause 78 of the Bill, where, for the avoidance of doubt, there is a provision to identify who the relevant person is. That person is clearly specified as the person who is responsible for paying the agency worker in respect of the work. It is to avoid some of the confusion that arises in these arrangements that these specific provisions are there.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c1005 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Directors Age Contributions Advisory services Women Liability Income tax Information Employment agencies Pensioners Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Pension funds Low pay Temporary employment State retirement pensions Young people Small businesses Tax allowances Repayments Taxation Tax rates and bands National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk