Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

We think this is a good amendment. We are very much in favour of clarity where advice is concerned and it is clearly not the role of employers to give advice. We will obviously be even more sympathetic if, over the course of our discussions between now and Report, the Conservatives feel able to support us so we can work something out, making it quite clear that the responsibility for advice does not rest with employers but outside in a proper nationwide generic free service. That is not a joke. It has to be one or the other and it is very important that we have clarity that the responsibility does not rest with employers. It was interesting in our previous debate that the Minister was quite reluctant to cross the line between information and advice. We need to be very clear on that so we support this amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c1006-7 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Directors Age Contributions Advisory services Women Liability Income tax Information Employment agencies Pensioners Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Pension funds Low pay Temporary employment State retirement pensions Young people Small businesses Tax allowances Repayments Taxation Tax rates and bands National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk