Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

Like others, I think this is a useful amendment, simply for its clarification. The Government intend only that employers will be a conduit for information, not providers of it. That is a useful distinction to draw. I have not worked the implications through, but we were quite glad to have the ““in good faith”” clause in at various points of the 2004 Bill. I wonder whether that could apply to an employer who provides information in good faith in compliance with any regulations issued. I say that because one thinks about some of the problems we have had of alleged misunderstanding or leaflets allegedly going astray. ““In good faith”” then becomes a reasonable defence. I was told on one occasion that it would be a reasonable defence even though it is not in the Bill, but it might give appropriate additional comfort if it were there.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c1007 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Directors Age Contributions Advisory services Women Liability Income tax Information Employment agencies Pensioners Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Pension funds Low pay Temporary employment State retirement pensions Young people Small businesses Tax allowances Repayments Taxation Tax rates and bands National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk