Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

I am happy to write and provide any stats we have. However, I reaffirm the principle that if we aligned to the upper earnings limit in the primary threshold—and those are generally uprated by inflation Rooker-wise and by everything that went with it—there would be a potentially growing divergence, on the assumption that earnings are generally ahead of prices. Over time and the longer term, there could be a considerable divergence between those thresholds and the thresholds that we are considering when they are updated by earnings. I do not have data for the top end, but as regards the lower threshold, in 2012—these are in 2006-07 earnings terms—the amount would be £5,035. It would be the same in 2030-40 in current earnings terms. If we uprated that band by prices, by 2040 the £5,035 would have reduced to £2,890 and we would be back with the problem of potentially incentivising people into pensions for whom the state was providing a better replacement rate. That is why we think the link with earnings is particularly important. I am happy to share the data with my noble friend and other noble Lords.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c1014 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Directors Age Contributions Advisory services Women Liability Income tax Information Employment agencies Pensioners Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Pension funds Low pay Temporary employment State retirement pensions Young people Small businesses Tax allowances Repayments Taxation Tax rates and bands National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk