Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

I am extremely grateful to the Minister. I am sorry if I have caused difficulty for some Members of the Committee, but glad that the Minister had no difficulty. I was really getting at the Minister’s answer to whether the Government are asking schemes to change their arrangements. I am glad to hear that the answer is no and that the Government intend to avoid this outcome. Clearly, the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, is quite right. This has a relevance to our future discussion on qualifying schemes, but I was very careful almost to avoid mentioning them in moving this amendment. For both reasons, I am pleased that we had what the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, might call a pre-discussion. We have had this little debate and it will be extremely useful for our future consideration and other parts of Part 1. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 43 not moved.] Clause 12 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c1020 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Directors Age Contributions Advisory services Women Liability Income tax Information Employment agencies Pensioners Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Pension funds Low pay Temporary employment State retirement pensions Young people Small businesses Tax allowances Repayments Taxation Tax rates and bands National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk