Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
As I have tried to make clear, it is the ““et cetera”” that worries me. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 89) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 158; Not-Contents, 65. Clause 29, as amended, agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c15
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Workplace pensions Pensions Means-tested benefits National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 12:48:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488121
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488121
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488121