Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Education and Skills Bill.


Education and Skills Bill

If we are looking only at that, it can be basket weaving as long as it is accredited; it not need be anything which constitutes the duty of 280 hours of guided learning. So there is no check-up on that process happening there. If it is that light, any accredited course will do. It does not say that it has to be an accredited course which fulfils the 280-hours duty. So we come back again to my suggestion that there should be some kind of document. If we are to have a letter from an education provider anyway, we may as well say what that letter should contain—that it should provide contact details; that it should involve giving permission for conversation; and that it should say that the training satisfies the 280 hours the duty requires. It is a simple thing to require an education provider to do and seems the easiest way of getting round the problem. I shall not chase the Minister further at the moment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c227 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Employment Education Further education Learning disability Local education authorities Training Young people Young offenders Small businesses School councils
Legislation
Education and Skills Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk