Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Vadera (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (Amendment) Regulations 2008.


National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (Amendment) Regulations 2008

I believe that it would not. However, I suspect that it would depend on how the work provided in lieu of accommodation has been declared. The hourly rate for work carried out elsewhere would be subject to the national minimum wage provisions. However, I am still not sure that I have understood the noble Lord’s question. Therefore, I shall take it away and respond in writing. I can only restate for the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, the Government’s clear view on pay restraint. Temporary price increases will sustain inflation if they lead to a spiral of wage increases. Therefore, we remain firm on all issues relating to public sector pay. As regards the impact on businesses, an impact assessment has shown that the cost will be somewhere between zero and £62 million. Given the rate of inflation and average wages, I should say that that will be a decreasing cost. As I said, the measure is in line with average earnings so there will not be an additional cost in adhering to the national minimum wage provisions. I commend the regulations to the Committee. On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c79GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Employment schemes Jobcentre Plus Minimum wage
Legislation
National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (Amendment) Regulations 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk