Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill.
Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill
I was given an interesting rebuke by the noble Lord, Lord Richard, and I understand the position from which he speaks, but there are times when we in our party wish to make it clear where we stand on a particular interest, of which this is one. We are perfectly entitled to do that. He shakes his head impatiently, but he is playing a different kind of politics from that which we practise on our side of the Committee.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1126-7
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Common law Intimidation Protection Property Magistrates' courts New Zealand Witnesses Trials
- Legislation
- Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:30:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492576
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492576
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492576