Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill.
Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill
In the debate on this group of amendments, I have become something of an innocent bystander—at least, some might say that it is in my self-interest to portray myself in that disguise. As the noble and learned Baroness must know, I am extremely sympathetic to the amendments of both the noble Lords, Lord Thomas of Gresford and Lord Lester of Herne Hill. However, as I said on Second Reading, due to the undertakings that the Government gave then, and have reinforced during debate on this group, I shall not feel able to support the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, in the Lobby when he puts forward his Amendment No. 9; but he should not deduce from that in any way that I do not agree with it in every respect. I beg leave to withdraw my amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1127
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Common law Intimidation Protection Property Magistrates' courts New Zealand Witnesses Trials
- Legislation
- Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:30:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492577
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492577
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492577