Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill.
Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill
I quite understand. The noble and learned Lord may have pointed out a valid drafting point. I always hope that the merits of any amendment that one tables overcome the technical incompetence in the drafting. However, my experience in your Lordships’ House, at least as far as the Government are concerned, is that hope springs eternal. My amendment does not seem to have excited great interest among those who have been intervening consistently in the course of the other groups. I feel strongly that this consideration ought to be promoted to a condition. However, in the circumstances in which we find ourselves, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1129
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Common law Intimidation Protection Property Magistrates' courts New Zealand Witnesses Trials
- Legislation
- Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:30:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492585
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492585
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492585