Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill.
Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill
Surely not. The most important matter that I am seeking to establish in this group of amendments is that contained in Amendment No. 7A. From what the Minister has said in reply, my understanding is that, in effect, the expression, "““the court must have regard (in particular) to any reasonable fear on the part of the witness””," would require the court to make an assessment of reasonableness. That would have to be an important component in what the court undertakes. The Minister appears to me to have confirmed that already; but he may wish to confirm it again. I take it that he said that and, in those circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment, satisfied that discussions on this line have not been in vain. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 4F not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1133-4
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Common law Intimidation Protection Property Magistrates' courts New Zealand Witnesses Trials
- Legislation
- Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:30:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492596
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492596
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492596