Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill.
Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill
I apologise for interrupting when the noble Viscount has only just started his reply, but when I said, ““we are not sure””, it was meant to be a courteous way of saying that we do not think that his amendments would be of assistance. That is what I meant. I do not want him to be under any misapprehension about what I said.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1136
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Common law Intimidation Protection Property Magistrates' courts New Zealand Witnesses Trials
- Legislation
- Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:30:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492602
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492602
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492602