---

Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill

I confess that I find that answer unsatisfactory. The defendant cannot know whether he had a fair trial; he cannot know whether, if he had known the name of the witnesses, he would have had any further questions to put. If he had known the witness’s identity, he might have called all sorts of evidence and cross-examined heavily. Alternatively, if he had known the witness’s identity, he might have had nothing further to say. How can the defendant demonstrate, therefore, that he did not receive a fair trial? All he can say is, ““It does not seem to me that I had a fair trial because I did not have a chance to put the points that I might have put if I had known who was giving evidence””. I am deeply unsatisfied with the Minister’s answer. However, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 11 agreed to. Clause 12 [Interpretation]: