Proceeding contribution from Keith Vaz (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
The hon. Gentleman is right to talk about the draconian implications of proscription. Does he agree that the ability given to organisations to challenge their inclusion in the list is vague? Should there not be much more clarity about how that can be challenged?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 479 c196
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Appeals Proscribed organisations Terrorism Hezbollah Hamas Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2008
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:44:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492805
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492805
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492805