Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.


Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

I take my right hon. Friend's point, but I repeat: there is at least a degree of responsibility on those organisations to ensure that they are au fait with the law and that they are not intent on supporting organisations that have a terrorist bent, whether proscribed or otherwise. On the wider issue of engagement, the Government act in the normal fashion, through the engagement of the Foreign Office and the Department for Communities and Local Government with a range of communities, as well as through the Home Office and other parts of the Government, which take those opportunities to tell people, if appropriate, about the Government's prevailing view of particular organisations, especially proscribed ones. That happens regularly. On the specific threat that we face from violent extremism, my right hon. Friend will know, too, that there are a range of issues—principally involving DCLG, but also involving the police, under our broad prevent agenda—on which we are doing precisely that kind of work, albeit in a more sustained and focused way, particularly in respect of the Islamist or jihadist threat that we face.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
479 c209 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Appeals Proscribed organisations Terrorism Hezbollah Hamas Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk