Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness on her ingenuity. No one is better than her at spotting a Christmas tree to start hanging things on. As an opposition spokesman who may well be an opposition spokesman in a few years, although Governments may change, I am always sympathetic to or in favour of a report every five years or so. A maximum amount of contributions is perfectly understandable. Perhaps the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, would clarify for me the implication of, "““whether any further transfers into or out of the scheme should be allowed””." Is the implication of that question that transfers should be stopped completely, or is it an open question? Subject to that, the amendment seems to be sensible.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c210
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Contributions Finance Government assistance Pay Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Personal pensions Non-departmental public bodies Pension funds Pension rights Trusts Personal Accounts Delivery Authority Pension accounts
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:45:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497403
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497403
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497403