Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
My Lords, is the noble Baroness saying that that judgment arises from her belief that there is not a public service obligation? Alternatively, if she accepted that there was a public service obligation, would she then accept at least the potential for subsidy to be appropriate, subject to all the restrictions we have identified?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c225
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Contributions Finance Government assistance Pay Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Personal pensions Non-departmental public bodies Pension funds Pension rights Trusts Personal Accounts Delivery Authority Pension accounts
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:45:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497435
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497435
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497435