Proceeding contribution from Lynne Jones (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 22 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords].
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords]
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I note that the order in which the amendments are printed in the Order Paper is also not in accordance with the usual convention. Normally, the new clauses are printed first, followed by the amendments in the order in which they relate to the Bill. In today's Order Paper, that convention has not been followed. On whose authority has this unconventional means of dealing with the amendments taken place?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 481 c323
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Related items
-
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords]
Wednesday, 22 October 2008
Proceeding contributions
House of Commons
- Subjects
- Civil partnerships Clones Animals Abortion Congenital abnormalities Fertility Licensing Human embryo experiments Diseases Donors Genetics Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Ethics IVF Fathers Medical treatments Northern Ireland Parents Mental capacity Screening Research Surrogacy Human-animal hybrid embryos
- Legislation
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:00:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_502378
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_502378
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_502378