Proceeding contribution from Greg Knight (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Canterbury City Council Bill.
Canterbury City Council Bill [Lords] (By Order)
Does my hon. Friend agree that, as a general principle, a Bill that gives anyone power to seize someone else's goods should also provide for adequate and proper compensation? That does not appear to be the case with the Bill that we are discussing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 481 c996
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Canterbury City Council Touting Street trading Canterbury
- Legislation
- Canterbury City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:15:47 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504437
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504437
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504437