Proceeding contribution from Mark Hoban (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords].
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords]
I would rather have the comfort of knowing that the Government were obliged to have another review, rather than leave it to the whim of Treasury Ministers. That is a much more secure basis on which to have the review than to allow one review and for the matter then to be put back on the shelf and forgotten about. The requirement to have ongoing reviews, with the Government able to determine when those reviews should stop through the statutory instrument process that is in my new clause, would be a far better safeguard for consumers and voluntary groups and would show that the scheme is working effectively.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 482 c28
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Devolved matters Charities Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Finance Insolvency Financial Services Authority Personal savings Northern Ireland Scotland Registration Voluntary organisations Young people Regulation Wales Youth services Big Lottery Fund
- Legislation
- Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:05:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505366
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505366
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505366