Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords].
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [Lords]
Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the scope of new clause 3 is rather tighter than that of new clause 2 in respect of the topics that must be included in the review? I shall not read out new clause 3(2), but it seems more onerous on the Treasury in respect of the review than the provisions under new clause 2. New clause 3 seems more desirable in that respect.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 482 c31
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Devolved matters Charities Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Finance Insolvency Financial Services Authority Personal savings Northern Ireland Scotland Registration Voluntary organisations Young people Regulation Wales Youth services Big Lottery Fund
- Legislation
- Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:20:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505371
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505371
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505371