Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 6 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on Fighting Crime (Public Engagement).
Fighting Crime (Public Engagement)
There are two sides to the issue. Advice and guidance could be given to provide greater clarity, as the hon. Gentleman suggests, but clarity is equally obtained through enforcement, from cases and the response of the police and law enforcement agencies to particular circumstances. The balance has been skewed so far in the other direction that it has led to real fear in the minds of the public. It is not just a matter of understanding ““reasonable force””, which is clearly understood by the police and the prosecutors. I argued earlier that it is important to clarify the public interest test for Crown prosecutors so that they are clear in their assessment of these cases and the police are equally clear about what they can do to support those who conduct a citizen's arrest. As I said, such people should be supported in taking proportionate and reasonable action.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 482 c410
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crime Finance Police Public participation Police community support officers Special constables Police patrolling Neighbourhood watch schemes
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:30:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506609
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506609
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506609