Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Nick Gibb (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education and Skills Bill.


Education and Skills Bill

I will not. The hon. Gentleman will soon have his moment. As my noble Friend Lady Morris, who speaks for the Opposition in the other place, said in Committee:"““I sound a note of caution…. It may not be the best course of action to be too prescriptive. We think that it is best left up to schools, not central government, to decide on the best way to engage their students.””—[Official Report, House of Lords, 1 July 2008; Vol. 703, c. 230.]" We fully endorse that view. It is odd, therefore, that a Liberal Democrat peer should have tabled a series of very prescriptive and centralising amendments that will, once statutory guidance is introduced, effectively dictate to schools the issues on which they will be obliged to consult pupils. I had thought that it was a Liberal Democrat mantra that such decisions should be made at the local level.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
483 c88 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
House of Commons Assessments Disclosure of information Codes of practice Admissions Curriculum Appeals Age Costs Civil proceedings Custodial treatment Fees and charges Governing bodies Inspections Enforcement House of Lords Fines Home education Personal records Private education Pupil exclusions Pupils National curriculum tests Part-time education Regulation Registration Schools Special educational needs Training School leaving Sixth form education Specialised diplomas Day release School councils Connexions Service Ofsted
Legislation
Education and Skills Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk