Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

My Lords, I beg to move that this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 160, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 160A. Lords Amendment No. 160 was considered by the other place on 24 November. The other place disagreed with the amendment on the grounds of financial privilege. Noble Lords will be aware that the Companion to the Standing Orders makes it clear that the Lords do not insist on their amendments when the Commons have disagreed on these grounds. Given this, I ask that the House does not insist on its Amendment No. 160. Moved, That this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 160, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 160A.—(Baroness Andrews.)

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c1356 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Delegated legislation Brownfield sites Housing Finance Fees and charges Land Infrastructure Land use Gardens Planning permission Planning Parliamentary scrutiny Property development Parks Regional planning and development Urban areas Community infrastructure levy Parliamentary privilege
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk