Proceeding contribution from Richard Ottaway (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 January 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Business Rate Supplements Bill.
Business Rate Supplements Bill
I was waiting until my hon. Friend had finished on Crossrail before asking him a question, and I think he is now moving on. The Opposition amendment declines to give the Bill a Second Reading because it"““fails to limit the application of supplementary business rates to the Greater London Authority and the Crossrail project.””" What limitations would my hon. Friend like to have seen, had we been in government at the time?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 486 c52
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Accountancy Companies Administration Costs Business Elizabeth line Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Empty property Exemptions Economic growth Local government Local government finance Ports Public consultation Public expenditure Rates and rating Property Business rates Tax allowances Valuation Surcharges Tax collection Business improvement districts Community infrastructure levy Local authority business growth incentives scheme
- Legislation
- Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 21:46:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517284
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517284
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517284