Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 29 January 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2009.


Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2009

My Lords, I thank the Minister for giving that detailed explanation of what is in the two instruments. I listened to what he had to say with great care. I have also read what his colleague said in the Commons when these instruments went through last week. I looked at the questions that my honourable friend Mr Bellingham and others put to the Government on that occasion. Most of those queries have been answered, so I shall repeat only one question on behalf of my honourable friend. He asked, "““why the rules are so far-reaching that they allow proceedings to be carried on with and determined without a hearing taking place at all?””.—[Official Report, Commons, Eleventh Delegated Legislation Committee, 21/1/09; col. 6.]" Perhaps the Minister could give an explanation in advance of his honourable friend writing to my honourable friend. That would be useful. Other than that, I can confirm that we believe that these are non-controversial.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c434 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Courts Assets Civil proceedings Advocacy Fees and charges Documents Legal costs Northern Ireland Public interest Vetting Terrorism Small businesses Supreme Court Rules of procedure High Court Small claims Special advocates Freezing of assets
Legislation
Rules of the Supreme Court (Northern Ireland) (Amendment No. 3) 2008
Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk