Proceeding contribution from Shona McIsaac (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 1 April 2009. It occurred during Legislative debate on Rating and Valuation (S.I., 2009, No. 204).
Rating and Valuation (S.I., 2009, No. 204)
I thank my right hon. Friend for giving way and for the many, many meetings that he has had with Labour Members. I would be curious to know how many meetings he has had with Opposition Members. For businesses operating in ports, is not the crux of the matter the fact that they believe that they will be paying double? They are not arguing about whether they have that liability; rather, they are arguing about the fact that they have already paid an amount to the operators through the cumulo system to cover business rates. Those businesses feel that it is grossly unfair that they are paying double. All the measures in the regulations we are debating are fine, but they do not address that point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 490 c994
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Business Arrears Payments Ports Rates and rating Business rates Valuation Office Agency
- Legislation
- Non-domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:26:45 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545842
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545842
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545842