Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 April 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
I promise that we will have that in mind, but a number of issues arise. One is that for a fixed monetary penalty, a notice must be served allowing representation to be made by the individual or the party to what is intended. Also, after representation has been made, there is a right of appeal to a county court against the decision of the commission and any penalties that have been imposed. Thus, careful balances have already been made. Of course, my noble friend has a good point. The threshold may be lowered and the commission may be tempted more often than it has been in the past. That is possible. But it is important that the system is enforced, as I think he will agree, so that public confidence can be upheld. When I write to him, I will make sure that I explain why I do not feel that there is a real danger that someone in the position of the person he described will in any way come out worse than under present conditions.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c99-100GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Civil proceedings Finance Elections Enforcement Fixed penalties Electoral Commission Electoral register Powers Political parties Sanctions
- Legislation
- Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:08:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_551255
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_551255
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_551255