Proceeding contribution from Baroness Gould of Potternewton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
I thank my noble friend for the amendments. I was confused when I first read this clause because it raised a whole lot of questions in my mind. The amendments have sorted out, or at least rectified, some of my queries, but I still have a couple of questions. The first concerns the elective office. I am not sure who that covers as no list is available. Secondly, how will we make people aware that this is a possibility, and what incentive will they have for appointing a compliance officer? I am not opposing the principle because I understand that anything that will take away the burdens from local officers will make a big difference. I am happy with the concept but there are one or two queries still in my mind.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c177GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Costs Finance Elections Donors Expenditure Electoral Commission Members Political parties Loans Regulation Trade unions Tax allowances Taxation
- Legislation
- Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:13:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_553519
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_553519
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_553519