Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.


Political Parties and Elections Bill

I do not think that I can make my position clearer. I think the noble Lord will agree that he is trying to entrap me into making a commitment that we will always maintain a consensus. I was saying that we have been committed to consensus throughout this process. I do not think that that is likely to change, given the commitments that I and my noble friend Lord Bates, together with others in another place, have made, and I shall not go any further than that. As I said, we still seek consensus. The only difference between my amendment and that of the Government is the small idea that we should consult the Electoral Commission. I should be very interested to hear what the Minister has to say about that when he comes to respond, if he thinks that it is necessary to say anything. Looking forward to his response, it is then likely that I will not move Amendment 113 but will accept the Government’s Amendment 112.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c200GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Costs Finance Elections Donors Expenditure Electoral Commission Members Political parties Loans Regulation Trade unions Tax allowances Taxation
Legislation
Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk