Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
It seems that there are congratulations all round, not only going back 20 years but also to the noble Lord, Lord Henley, on having the perspicacity, if that is the right word, to suggest what should be in this amendment. We do not think that a requirement to consult the Electoral Commission is necessary, as the Secretary of State’s discretion is limited to changes to reflect changes in the value of money. We think that it would be excessive to introduce a formal consultation requirement, and we are gratified that the commission itself seems to be of the same mind in that it does not consider it necessary to put such a requirement into the legislation. I imagine that in practice part of the Secretary of State’s review will involve taking into account the views of the commission regarding the likely impact of any potential change to thresholds. Amendment 112 agreed. Amendment 113 not moved. Clause 13, as amended, agreed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c200-1GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Costs Finance Elections Donors Expenditure Electoral Commission Members Political parties Loans Regulation Trade unions Tax allowances Taxation
- Legislation
- Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:49:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_553566
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_553566
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_553566