Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bates (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Business Rate Supplements Bill.


Business Rate Supplements Bill

I will be brief as all that needed to be said on this issue has been said far more eloquently and succinctly by my noble friend Lord Jenkin of Roding. He put his finger on the nub of the issue; the amendment, which may be a probing amendment, would introduce the potential for double charging the business rate supplement, levying up to 2p on the London business rates for Crossrail, and would allow local authorities—the boroughs—to initiate projects which could levy another 2p. I understand that if the amendment were accepted, similar dual charging possibilities could apply across the country wherever two-tier authorities exist. In places that may be close to our hearts at the moment, such as Lancashire, the county council could levy a charge and presumably a district council such as South Ribble could also levy a charge. This comes back to the point we have made throughout our discussion on the legislation; namely, that the Bill may have been conceived two years ago when the economic climate was completely different. It might have seemed a good idea then but this is about the worst possible time to introduce it. It has one purpose—to enable the development of Crossrail—and that should be the limit of its scope.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c301GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Business Housing Greater London Discounts Economic growth Local government Local government finance Public consultation Business rates Regional planning and development Business improvement districts
Legislation
Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk