Proceeding contribution from Jeremy Hunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 May 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Electronic Communications.
Electronic Communications
Let me make it absolutely clear that the Secretary of State is distorting what the Leader of Opposition said. He did not say that we should move to annual settlements for the BBC, and that is not our party's position, as the Secretary of State knows perfectly well. The current settlement, which started in 2007, is a six-year settlement, but the amount by which it will rise in the sixth year is to be determined at a later date. If it is so important not to settle the licence fee every year, even though it is possible to determine the amount received in the sixth year at a later date, why, given the extraordinary economic circumstances of the past six months, is it not sensible to review the position in the third year as well?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 492 c1582
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- BBC Broadcasting programmes Finance Fees and charges Payments Television licences
- Legislation
- Communications (Television Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:40:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_560617
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_560617
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_560617