Proceeding contribution from Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Business Rate Supplements Bill.
Business Rate Supplements Bill
Nevertheless, the fact remains that he takes a totally different view from a fellow Liberal Democrat. Indeed, the LGA does not stop at not wanting a ballot. It also wants to raise the limit to 4p and for local authorities to have a free hand to decide what to spend the money on. The Select Committee also said that we should leave ballots to the discretion of local authorities. The amendment in lieu creates the right balance. It would require a ballot if the contribution were more than 33.3 per cent., and introduce the additional safeguard that the local authority will have to set out in the prospectus its reasons to hold, or not hold, a ballot. Question put, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1. The House divided: Ayes 267, Noes 219.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 494 c351
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Local government Business rates Surcharges
- Legislation
- Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:12:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568016
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568016
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568016