Proceeding contribution from Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Business Rate Supplements Bill.
Business Rate Supplements Bill
As far as I am aware, and according to the figures that I have, the 1,600 properties were liable for rates from 1 April 2005, and paid rates in 2005-06 and 2007-08. Removing a backdated rates liability would turn a perceived advantage for newly assessed properties into an actual disadvantage for existing properties that have paid their rates liability for previous years. On the earlier point about empty properties, a landlord who takes over a rateable property that is empty would be liable for rates.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 494 c375
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Local government Business rates Surcharges
- Legislation
- Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:11:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568076
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568076
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568076