Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 July 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Parliamentary Standards Bill.
Parliamentary Standards Bill
My Lords, we had a brief discussion in Committee about the meaning of the word "consistency" in the subsection concerned. The noble Lord, Lord Borrie, suggested that it obviously referred back to the previous clause, and the noble Lord, Lord Bach, agreed with that. I suggested that if the word "such" were inserted, that would make it clear. That did not find favour, as was indicated in the letter that we had from the noble Baroness the Leader of the House. I therefore suggested the words in this amendment instead. This is a matter of legal interpretation; there is no real substance in the thing other than where it makes the issue clearer to the reader. As the Bill originally stood, the word "consistency" at the end of the subsection seemed to give rise to some confusion. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 712 c1432-3
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Appeals Conduct Allowances House of Lords EU law European Parliament members Members Parliament Standards Taxation European Court of Justice Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:04:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_579548
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_579548
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_579548