Proceeding contribution from Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 October 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [Lords].
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [Lords]
Surely the right hon. Lady accepts that it would have been better to introduce these proposals in less difficult and more economically benign times. The right hon. Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Mr. Raynsford) has mentioned the Latham review. We have had two substantive and detailed public consultations, detailed papers by the then Department of Trade and Industry, and the policy of the Welsh Assembly, yet only now, years after the Latham review, are the Government bringing forward the proposals, tacked on to another Bill and not as part of a substantive construction Bill. Is that not a fair point?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 497 c184-5
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Appeals Construction Civic dignitaries Insolvency Insurance Economic planning Local government Local government finance Payments Planning Public consultation Parish and town councils Public lavatories Regional planning and development Regional development agencies Petitions
- Legislation
- Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-02-21 15:18:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583687
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583687
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583687