Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Mackinlay (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 October 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [Lords].


Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [Lords]

Actually, I feel a little ashamed for not appreciating this matter at the time of the 2000 Act. I regret not having made an issue of it in the House at the time; no doubt I was distracted by other things. However, that Act has diminished local authorities' decision-making options and freedoms to decide how they reach their conclusions. I emphasise to the House that, if it agrees to my new clause, it would simply restore those options to local authorities. However, I cannot disguise my bias in favour of the committee system, which worked well in so many ways. Even in councils with pretty strong and rigorous party political operations, that system allowed a degree of involvement and—dare I say it—power sharing with those not of the persuasion of the majority party. I look to my hon. Friend the Member for Manchester, Blackley (Graham Stringer), who, for many years, was a member of Manchester city council. It was one of the greatest local authorities. Under a previous distinguished leader—I forget this name; it was Bob—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
497 c225 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Contracts Appeals Construction Civic dignitaries Insolvency Insurance Economic planning Local government Local government finance Payments Planning Public consultation Parish and town councils Public lavatories Regional planning and development Regional development agencies Petitions
Legislation
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk